Why don't we swoop and scoop side tissue?
I made a bra adventure about how full on top = top center heavy. I said Cleo is made for that shape.
So the opposite should be bottom side heavy? Are there any bras for that?
Of course there is: Plus size bras. Just look at how Sculptresse present their designs.
"Shaped underband. "For extra comfort embracing your natural contours"
Because the fatter we become the more our boobs slopes on the sides and fill out there.
When we talk about migrated breast tissue for some reason we always talks about the top tissue missing and having fat armpits and backs.
But the first thing I realized when I sized up was that my fat roll under the armpit wasn't on top but on bottom and where I get my scoping isn't from my back but from the sides of my stomach. For some strange reason no guides tells us how to swoop and scoop our sides and underbust lines.
The fat on my sides more than fill my hands. Having it outside the cups looks utterly ridiculous and forcing it front and center isn't possible. I don't even know why so few talks about swooping and scooping there. So far the only one I've seen making a serious guide about it is prettyNpetite
But really what's the difference?
Here are the posts by prettyNpetite: http://prettynpetitej.blogspot.se/2013/03/my-boobs-migrated-breast-tissue.html
http://prettynpetitej.blogspot.se/2013/03/too-big-band-and-my-way-of-swooping-and.html
Panache Sculptresse Bra Design Features | Panache Lingerie
http://panache-lingerie.com/us/sculptresse/DesignFeatures.aspx
Filed under Bra sizing and fit
10 comments
You mean this post? http://prettynpetitej.blogspot.se/2013/03/too-big-band-and-my-way-of-swooping-and.html
prettyNpetite Yes exactly! :) And also your first post about MBT in general :) I think on hourglass bodies it's quite logical to have tissue under the boobs and on the sides of them. :)
This thread has 10 comments. Log in to read them