5
Ewa Michalak PL vs. S
I have recently read that the PL is considered to be shallower and wider than the S. I found it strange, since in my size range (32G), the PL is the narrowest of all the Ewa Michalak bras I've tried, followed by the CH. And all I have read points out that the bottom projection of the PL is also much better than the S. What has been your experience in your size ranges?
Filed under Bras ups and downs
10 comments
In the size I tried (100H) the PL was much narrower than the S. It was also much taller in gore height, ironically. I found the bottom projection to be better as well, but the BM was the narrowest with the best bottom projection.
PL narrower than the S, really? Curious. Tho really, narrower might not help me unless there was room for my center fullness - i fall out the gore of my Ss, i cant imagine PLs would work better. 75JJs in S. my 75J BMs do seem to fit easier overall.
This thread has 10 comments. Log in to read them