Ewa Michalak SF vs S
What is the immediate projection in Ewa Michalak's SF cut like, compared to the projection in the S cut?
I tried the S Syrena model in a 30K, but even with the pads removed, it felt about 2 cup sizes to small for me, and the top of the cups gaped pretty badly, though the band was true to size.
Does the SF model have more projection in the K to KK cup-sizing range (assuming the same band size of 30)? I'd like the support that the padded Ewa models give, but I also need a mesh at the top of the cup that conforms to my (currently shallow) tissue.
Would the SF suit my needs?
Or should I try the all-over stretch mesh of the BM models instead?
Any advice welcome. Thanks
NB: It seems I might be sporadically busy today, im afraid my responses might be slow.***
Filed under Bra sizing and fit
6 comments
SF is not at all stretchy and is very shallow at the bottom, ot create more cleavage at the top. I find it much more shallow at the wire than the S is. Although to be fair, my SF (which i still can wear) is a 70J and my Ss are 75JJ.
But you do generally need to go up at least 1 cup size in the S compared to any unpadded bras.
You know, it also would really help if you could put up some pictures? do a fit request?
It sounds like you are FOB?
@dbmamaz Thanks so much for your reply!
Sorry about my late response. :(
Yes, my breast shape is actually Very Full on Top, but due to a lot of weight loss this year, there's just not enough tissue(?) to fill out the types of bras (like the S and possibly the CHP) that are generally recommended for my shape.
Functionally, the breast tissue behaves more like Full on Bottom now, if that makes any sense.
Dang, I was really hoping the SF would work, but it sounds like it may not be for me after all.
Im going to go ahead and try the BM and report back here with some pictures like you suggested.
Thank you again! :)
This thread has 6 comments. Log in to read them