- Strap separation:
- Are too far apart
- Top of the cup:
- Cuts into breast tissue (quad boob effect)
- Band fit:
- The back of the bra is not at the same level as the front (rides up)
Bra » Ewa Michalak » Hm Burek » 65DD » Bras » Owner
Measurements
Measurement | Cm |
---|---|
Search by measurements | |
Fits ribcage | 0.0 |
B. perimeter | 0.0 |
Stretched Band | 71.1 |
Band Length | 53.8 |
Stretch ratio | 1.3 |
Cup width | 12.7 |
Cup depth | 20.8 |
Depth ratio | 1.6 |
Wire length | 23.1 |
Cup height | 0.0 |
Cup separation | 2.0 |
Gore height | 7.6 |
Wing height | 7.4 |
Strap width | 1.5 |
Hooks | 2 |
Labeled as
Index | 30:5 |
---|---|
EU | 65DD |
Review
0
like
like
Used to fit
I normally wear a UK 28F, and the sizing calculator on the EM site gave me 65DD. This was, for the most part, accurate, or for this unlined half-cup style, at least. Your EM size will vary depending on the cut, whether it's padded or unpadded, materials, etc.
The band's absolute max stretch is 30", but this is when I'm pulling very hard and seems like I'm hurting the bra. I would recommend this for someone who measures at least 28.5" at the tightest--I had to wear it on the tightest or second tightest hooks, as I measure about 27" snugly.
The fit is a little off because of incompatible shape. This half-cup was just slightly too tall for my breasts (I have a short torso), so the lace edge floated a bit. Underneath the lace section, I got slight quadboob because the bra wants softer, less full-on-bottom breasts than mine.
I think it would fit great on someone who was even and maybe fuller-on-top, with softer boobs. The half-cups really give the breasts a round shape, and push them upwards and hold them close to the chest.
Four rows of two hooks instead of the usual three rows.This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Dec 15, 2013 Flag this