- Strap separation:
- Not a problem
- Top of the cup:
- Cuts into breast tissue (quad boob effect)
Bra » Ewa Michalak » Sm Wróżka (491) » 65GG » Bras » Owner
Measurements
Measurement | Cm |
---|---|
Search by measurements | |
Fits ribcage | 0.0 |
B. perimeter | 0.0 |
Stretched Band | 73.7 |
Band Length | 57.2 |
Stretch ratio | 1.3 |
Cup width | 15.7 |
Cup depth | 25.4 |
Depth ratio | 1.6 |
Wire length | 27.9 |
Cup height | 0.0 |
Cup separation | 1.3 |
Gore height | 7.4 |
Wing height | 12.2 |
Strap width | 1.5 |
Hooks | 2 |
Labeled as
Index | 30:10 |
---|---|
EU | 65GG |
Review
0
like
like
Didn't fit
Well, at this point I am certain this bra was manufactured incorrectly. Based on my own experience with it vs. other Ewa models, as well as what the review and measurements I'm reading for the next cup size up (65H).
So far in all of my Ewa bras, 65GG has been the best size. Until this one. This one is a bit too small, but not horribly so, and not small enough to cause quadboob.
The oddness starts with the fact that it's a 65GG with only 3 hooks! None of my other EM bras have less than 3 hooks (and my Gazeta has 4). Of course that confuses bratabase because it should come with 3. If there were a 65G 1/2, that would be more accurate for the size. I definitely quadboob out of 30Gs of all other models in that size I've tried on recently (which has been a few since I added some here), but this one is not quite that bad.
So anyway, it's weird. There's another person selling her 65H, which actually has less cup width than my 65GG, which also makes no sense. I think that something is just way off with the manufacturing of this particular bra. I'd measured the depth to be 10.0," and got the notification that my cup depth was too big. So I measured again, and it's really 10.3," which is apparently bigger than other 65GGs of this model have been. My Rokoko for example, in the same size, has a cup depth of 10," so I'm not sure why it would tell me the 10" I originally marked it was wrong-unless I'm right about the manufacturing issues.
All that said, I absolutely love this bra. It's very pretty. I find the lace to be nice, though not as soft as the lace of my Andorra. I have washed it, but haven't worn it much since the band is a little tighter than my usual 65s from her are. I plan to wear it with an extender for now (really, I only need a few more centimeters for it to be perfect) I think, but I'm in the process of losing weight again, so it should fit perfectly soon. Or at least I hope.
Anyway, would I buy this bra again? Probably not. I thought about selling it and buying the 65H that's available (and, annoyingly, custom now), but the measurements and cup seem wonky on it, too. So probably will keep this one. It's sexy and my husband loves it, so that's a plus too.
All of this definitely concerns me for future orders from her. I have one in right now as part of a small group, and I'm worried that the 65GG will be too small. I guess I'll find out in probably a month or so (manufacturing of one of them is going to take 2 extra weeks. Sigh). I'm excited and worried for it now.
Updated on Jun 20, 2014 Flag this
Fit information
On Mar 2014
This bra didn't fit her, but these did
-
Comexim Ingrid Plunge Bra (289)
-
Anna Pardal For Comexim Caramel Latte Longline
-
Cleo Molly (6476)
-
Fantasie Fleur Side Support Bra (2902)
-
Comexim Butterfly Biustonosz (285)
-
Comexim Ingrid Plunge Bra (289)
-
Comexim Audrey Plunge Bra (190)
-
Ewa Michalak Bm Bibi Beżowa Perła (533)
-
Panache Sport Sports Bra (5021)
-
Ewa Michalak Sm Cynamon (517)
-
Ewa Michalak S Pieprzyk (473)
-
Anna Pardal For Comexim Emeline Classic Plunge