Share your bras and experiences and help other women
Get recommendations, write review and learn more!

Got bras? Create an account

Bra » Ewa Michalak » Bm Aqua (578) » 70J » Bras » Owner

Measurements

Measurement Cm
Search by measurements
Fits ribcage0.0
B. perimeter0.0
Stretched Band84.0
Band Length71.0
Stretch ratio1.2
Cup width16.0
Cup depth32.6
Depth ratio2.0
Wire length32.0
Cup height0.0
Cup separation1.6
Gore height10.7
Wing height13.3
Strap width2.0
Hooks3
Compare to your bras

Labeled as

Index32:13
EU70J

Review

0
like

Fits

This bra is quite a schizophrenic case . https://d28qt14g3opchh.cloudfront.net/smileys/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" /> Nothing wrong with the colour scheme, it's nicely summery, and I do like the Bm style in general, it fits my breasts perfectly. But as I have the Bm Bibi to compare with, there's again that notorious Effuniak inconsistency in size - and this time in shape as well. The cup is somehow longer, which means that although it fits perfectly on the top part, bottom part and sides, there's empty space at the tip of the cup. Not much, but noticeably. I have arrived to the conclusion, however, that the size is right, so maybe I just got a monday specimen. https://d28qt14g3opchh.cloudfront.net/smileys/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" />
Pros:
- the Aqua is _seriously_ sturdy, must be the sturdiest EM I have. The stretch in the band is minimal - and it's tight
- Nice, fresh colour scheme
- Soft material, especially the lace on top of the cups. As a top-full boob gal, I appreciate it.
- Because of the sturdiness, the Bm profile shape gets the center stage. I really like it, it's very much like Cleo Meg shape.

Cons:
- big in the cup, compared to Bm Bibi
- The cup shape it longer (or is it deeper?) than in the Bibi

Updated on Sep 17, 2014 Flag this


Subscribe to updates on this entry


add a comment

Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

You need to sign in to comment