Better for FOT
- Center gore comfort:
- Underwires dig into sternum, because they are too high
- Strap separation:
- Are too far apart
- Top of the cup:
- Wrinkles, can't quite fill it
Measurement | Cm |
---|---|
Search by measurements | |
Fits ribcage | 0.0 |
B. perimeter | 0.0 |
Stretched Band | 77.5 |
Band Length | 61.0 |
Stretch ratio | 1.3 |
Cup width | 14.6 |
Cup depth | 22.9 |
Depth ratio | 1.6 |
Wire length | 25.4 |
Cup height | 14.0 |
Cup separation | 1.9 |
Gore height | 7.6 |
Wing height | 8.3 |
Strap width | 1.3 |
Hooks | 2 |
Index | 28:7 |
---|---|
UK | 28F |
Didn't fit
This bra is a shape mismatch for me. The cup volume feels about right, but the stretch lace at the top sags. It wasn't too bad initially, but after a couple wears it seems to stretch a bit and become more noticeable. It is made of a smooth and comfortable fabric, with a lace overlay. The band is firmer than my Cleo Lucy. I think it is better for even to FOT, rather than FOB. The straps chafe my armpits and this hasn't gotten much better even with wearing/washing.This bra is not owned any more
Updated on Sep 14, 2020 Flag this
Better for FOT