Bra » Ewa Michalak » S Beżuś (667) » 65GG » Bras » Owner
Measurements
Measurement | Cm |
---|---|
Search by measurements | |
Fits ribcage | 0.0 |
B. perimeter | 0.0 |
Stretched Band | 76.2 |
Band Length | 53.3 |
Stretch ratio | 1.4 |
Cup width | 14.6 |
Cup depth | 27.1 |
Depth ratio | 1.9 |
Wire length | 29.2 |
Cup height | 18.4 |
Cup separation | 1.3 |
Gore height | 8.3 |
Wing height | 11.4 |
Strap width | 1.9 |
Hooks | 3 |
Labeled as
Index | 30:10 |
---|---|
EU | 65GG |
Review
0
like
like
Hasn't set fit
B. perimeter 9
Stretched Band 30.0
Band Length 21.0
Stretch ratio 1.4
Cup width 5.75
Cup depth 10.65
Depth ratio 1.9
Wire length 11.5
Cup height 7.25
Cup separation 0.5
Gore height 3.25
Wing height 4.5
Strap width 0.75
Strap length 13.75
Hooks 3
After wearing the wonderfully light & spacious Comexim De Nuit with great success these last few months (despite cups not being quite wide enough for continually expanding breasts), bringing S Bezus into play has made it clear this is the superior shape for depth after removing the cookies. Somehow I'd forgotten about those, and felt the S cut too stiff, tall and while clearly a fuller shape, unable to allow space for my equally resistant breasts. Luckily, minor tinkering to adjust height brought it around, & is now my favorite between the 2 designs. I suspect that the cause of this fit difference is to do with the outer panel being very minimal in the armscye, and quickly expands to a marvelous level of depth before reaching the center cup seam.
The projection ratio used in this pattern is way stronger than in the SF, BM, HM, CHP or PL (listed in order from most projected to generally full), and GRRL! IT WORKS. While I do prefer the horizontal evenness in the De Nuit, it's not nearly as curvy in it's cut and suffers from my tough titties fighting back for breathing room. .
(Hint for those who haven't heard my eternal bitching: for not being 'projected', my breasts require an obscene amount of projection at the wire and at all areas in the cup- something 'shallow' & often conical cup shapes fail miserably at providing- even professional bra patterns are horridly flat & I tire of adding depth in depth in yet more depth into the lower cup for a basic not even good fit :/ )
While this cut has typically been a bad match for anyone picking between their projection needs & short breasts/roots height, it's absolutely amazing for depth if one can put it on inside out, and mark out a short 'fisheye' dart at bottom center of cup to tack the difference in height down (one might try this just below the upper band in cup but bulk weirdness seems like it wouldn't be worth it)
Updated on Mar 14, 2022 Flag this
Fit information
This bra didn't fit her, but these did
-
Anna Pardal For Comexim Milk & Honey Classic Plunge
-
Panache Rocha Spacer Bra (10346)
-
Katherine Hamilton Vivian
-
Aubade Softessence Half Cup Bra (TMF14)
-
Curvy Kate Vegas Balcony Bra (CK5601)
-
Ewa Michalak Ch Zielony Pieprzyk
-
Ewa Michalak Chp Oksana (1029)
-
Comexim Tiffany Plunge Bra (409)
-
Ewa Michalak Bm Antonina (1314)
-
Ewa Michalak M Tango Bra (1273)
-
Prima Donna Madison Underwired Bra (0162121)
-
Ava Iris Blue 1846 (1846)