Gallery

very tall for me in the center of cup, but finally! some depth where it's needed, in the outer half. not spilling out all over the place. Probably not my best fit but definitely one of the most comfortable
Sabine vs Basic, several sizes off. Sabine's inner cup is longer and more defined curve by nip, basic is wider in general & feels like better immediate depth when comparing patterns & their scaling.
The slight dent in the foam seems to be exaggerated in the 'fully upright position'. with the lower cup 'properly' positioned high up over IMF, volume overflow crams up to just above this zone, like breast is trying to crawl out of the armscye. The closer down it's upper band is brought, the less this happens. Guessing immediate depth zone is not up to par with my root size, but has great overall depth, big surprise.
folded out height to needed length. will baste out the difference.
full length shot of the depth and proportions, for anyone whose interested.
basted out length on left of image, folded over too-tall cup on the right of image. Right looks and feels better, but fussy for mobility, little room for depth at wire. Left gets in way of general depth needs, but seats better overall. Meh. I don't want to reduce height in the middle of cup but looks like that's going to work better than either of these.
oh boy we're doing this? We're doing this. Outer breast has decided to 'sit' in, and attempt a squash the outer cup. It's fine we have that issue with literally every damn bra on earth. Should have expected this here too.
Sabine 28H without any tailoring, compared with altered Cleo Mimi which was originally a 36D. Both have side dents which bode badly for full on sides shape, but both are also the more forgiving and accepting cuts for same. Looking forward to Sabine putting Mimi's weirdo copycattery to shame.