Share your bras and experiences and help other women
Get recommendations, write review and learn more!

Got bras? Create an account

Bras » Panache » Jasmine Balconnet Bra (6951) » 34J 34:13

Measurement Cm
Search by measurements
Fits ribcage86.9
B. perimeter42.4
Stretched Band89.9
Band Length74.1
Cup width18.3
Cup depth36.7
Wire length38.7
Cup height24.7
Cup separation1.6
Gore height11.0
Wing height12.6
Strap width1.9
Hooks3

4 measurements - 12 bras

Compare this bra

Read reviews

  1. 1
    like

    Used to fit

    This is one of my favorite bras despite the mildly pointy profile. It is the first bra I have owned where the band was comfortably firm, the cups were sufficiently big, and the wires were actually wide enough for my quite broad root.

    It gives excellent lift with an angled lower panel but still has sufficient lower volume for my mostly even shape, and the top panel is stretch lace so ladies of all levels of upper fullness can makes this bra work without quad boobing. There's more projection in this bra than with other Panache Superbra models, such as the Panache Sienna (4471) , and ... the gore is pretty slim.

    The cup looks fairly opaque on bottom when worn, but this is an unlined and unpadded bra which is actually sheer when held up to the light. It is very thin and breathable, yet I have no problems with nipple show through as my nipples tend to fall right on the seam.

    I have found that the underwires are a little more narrow for me than they originally felt - perhaps it's just the angle of them on the outside - but I only notice when I am getting out of the car. The way that I tend to lean on the side of the driver's side seat when I swing my legs around has been pinching some of my tissue between the car seat and the back of the underwire. It's super weird.

    The gore is also quite tall and tacks firmly. I have a layer of fat on my sternum because I'm a bigger lady, so over the course of a day the gore can actually push my little bit of chest chub up above where the gore rests and stab up into it. Usually I just give it an upward tug to resettle things, but I intend to bend the underwires out slightly as a long term solution.

    This bra fits very similarly to the Panache Andorra Full Cup (5675).

    Read more
    226 more words

    Updated on May 07, 2013 Flag this

    1. Link to this bra
    2. Fit information
    3. Other bras that fit her
    Quality
    Excellent!
    Comfort
    Excellent!
    Bra appearance
    Excellent!

    Subscribe to updates on this entry

    • Interesting, I'm surprised you find it similar to the Andorra! Myself, I think Andorra had a lot less depth and lower files in it, and I'd need at least one cupsize bigger in it than Jasmine. ( Also hi! Nice to see someone around in similar sizes. :) )

    • Hey Elphabra ! :)

      The 34J Jasmine is a really good fit for me, whereas the Andorra Full Cup in 34J does ever so slightly indent me at the top - which since it is stretch lace really shouldn't happen. So I don't disagree that the Andorra runs a touch smaller! I'm not convinced it's a full cup size of difference between the two; I'm on the larger end of 34J it makes sense that I'm having minor and nearly undetectable quad boob issues. You make a good point though and I should have mentioned this in my review - whoops!

      Mainly I think I was trying to convey that the wire widths were comparable and the shapes they gave were similar, as the seam patterns are similar and they both use stretch lace for the upper panel. I made a collage of various bras to demonstrate the shape similarity just yesterday:

      http://i.imgur.com/nVl0hoQ.png

      Left to right:

      Panache Andorra Full Cup 34J - 3 part cup with inner side support sling
      Panache Jasmine 34J - 4 part cup including side support panel
      Panache Andorra Plunge 36H
      Cleo Lizzie 36HH
      Cleo Marcie 36HH

      Thanks for commenting :]

    add a comment

    Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

    You need to sign in to comment


  2. 0
    like

    Didn't fit

    While it fit quite well, I didn't care for the somewhat pointy shape it gave me. I now know this is common with Jasmine and breasts that are more full on bottom than full on top.

    It was comfortable to wear, and it did a good job of both sitting in my IMF and holding in my soft, center full tissue near the gore.

    Having tried both this and Sculptresse Chi Chi, I would pick Chi Chi if I wasn't sized out of it. It gave me a rounder shape and is made of higher quality materials. Not that Jasmine feels cheap, but there's a noticeable difference compared to Chi Chi.

    Orchid print colorway

    This bra is not owned any more

    Updated on Oct 01, 2016 Flag this


    add a comment

    Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

    You need to sign in to comment


  3. 0
    like

    Used to fit

    I have a thing for leopard print bras and panties, so I had been eyeing this print for some time. The Nordstrom I visited didn't have a lathe selection - this was the only J+ cup they even had in store. Fortunately 34J is a sister size.

    It gives nice shape, very rounded. It's quite comfortable. The wires seem to be a good width for me and the gore as well. I like the lacey upper section since it helps with my breast size fluctuating throughout the day from breastfeeding. The band fits me pretty well, maybe it could stand to be a tad tighter for my liking but for a 34 I believe it fits true to size.

    The lacey upper section is quite soft on my skin. The actual leopard print isn't tacky looking (in my opinion!), but just a little more "sexy" than some of the almost old lady floral prints some other @Panache bras seem to go for.

    leopard colorway

    Updated on Nov 18, 2014 Flag this


    add a comment

    Use @ to mention users, brands, models and more

    You need to sign in to comment


  4. -

    Hasn't set fit

    Didn't write a review

    This bra is not owned any more

    Added on Jan 17, 2016



  5. -

    Hasn't set fit

    Didn't write a review

    Added on Feb 11, 2016



  6. -

    Fits

    Didn't write a review

    Added on Aug 25, 2016



  7. -

    Didn't fit

    Didn't write a review

    Added on Aug 21, 2017



  8. -

    Fits

    Didn't write a review

    Added on Nov 12, 2017



  9. -

    Didn't fit

    Didn't write a review

    Added on Apr 01, 2013



  10. -

    Hasn't set fit

    Didn't write a review

    Added on Sep 23, 2024



  1. «
  2. »
  3. 2 Pages