Comparing a 65FF Ewa Michalak Strapless Toffi (91) with a 65F Ewa Michalak Ch Lato (271)
Summary
The band is pretty much the same in both bras. The 65FF bra has wider cups but they are both about the same depth.
Sizing
The 65FF is 1 cup bigger than the 65F.
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak Strapless Toffi (91) |
65F 30:7 Ewa Michalak Ch Lato (271) |
|
Fits ribcage | ||
---|---|---|
72.4 (+2.1cm) | 70.3 | |
Breast perimeter | ||
24.8 (+0.8cm) | 24.0 | |
Band length | ||
58.4 | 58.8 (+0.3cm) | |
Stretched band | ||
73.4 | 75.0 (+1.6cm) | |
Cup width | ||
14.2 (+0.9cm) | 13.3 | |
Cup depth | ||
22.8 (+0.7cm) | 22.1 | |
Wire length | ||
24.4 (+1.8cm) | 22.7 | |
Cup height | ||
16.5 (+1.5cm) | 15.0 | |
Gore height | ||
5.1 | 6.2 (+1.1cm) | |
Wing height | ||
10.4 (+1.4cm) | 9.0 | |
Strap width | ||
0.0 | 1.7 (+1.7cm) | |
Cup separation | ||
1.7 | 1.8 (+0.1cm) | |
Hooks | ||
3 | 2 | |
Total bras | ||
9 | 5 |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesI would say that the 65FF strapless toffi is about the same size as the 65F lato. There is more depth to the lato, but the cup is also more narrow. They are both similar to a 30E/28F freya deco size wise. I am a 30F/FF in most freya and panache bras, and I have wide-rooted, shallow breasts. Both of these bras were too small in the cup for me, but I'm not sure if it's a shape issue or a size issue.
Updated on Oct 29, 2012