Comparing a 28FF Cleo Melissa (6991) with a 28G Cleo Olivia (6631)
Summary
The band is pretty much the same in both bras. The 28G bra has deeper cups than the 28FF bra, but they are about the same width.
Sizing
The 28FF is 1 cup smaller than the 28G.
28FF 28:8 Cleo Melissa (6991) |
28G 28:9 Cleo Olivia (6631) |
|
Fits ribcage | ||
---|---|---|
68.6 | 72.0 (+3.4cm) | |
Breast perimeter | ||
24.8 (+24.8cm) | 0.0 | |
Band length | ||
56.4 | 58.1 (+1.6cm) | |
Stretched band | ||
70.9 | 71.2 (+0.4cm) | |
Cup width | ||
13.5 | 13.7 (+0.2cm) | |
Cup depth | ||
24.0 | 26.4 (+2.4cm) | |
Wire length | ||
24.6 | 27.5 (+3.0cm) | |
Cup height | ||
15.9 (+15.9cm) | 0.0 | |
Gore height | ||
7.1 | 8.0 (+0.9cm) | |
Wing height | ||
9.0 | 9.7 (+0.7cm) | |
Strap width | ||
1.5 | 1.8 (+0.3cm) | |
Cup separation | ||
1.9 | 1.9 (+0.0cm) | |
Hooks | ||
2 | 2 | |
Total bras | ||
16 | 3 |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesI find the band of the Melissa to be EVER so slightly more snug than the Olivia, though they are both 28s, but this is barely noticeable. I found the Olivia's band to be nice and firm.
The 28G Olivia, when I still wore a 28G, fit similarly to the 28FF Melissa does now (now that I am a 28FF), except that the Melissa is SLIGHTLY more of a held-forward fit, in my opinion. The Olivia is still an up-front bra with a rounded shape, and I think has a lovely fit, and very similar IMO, the Melissa is just a bit more straight forward.
Size-wise, I think the cups of the two styles are consistent from size to size. I think a 28FF Olivia would fit be beautifully because the 28FF Melissa does (unlike, say the Juna, which does not fit me in a 28FF, and I had to size up).
The fabric of the two bras is also similar, and provides a nice amount of support.
Updated on Feb 24, 2013