Comparing a 75K Ewa Michalak Pl Black (64) with a 34JJ Elomi Caitlyn Underwire Side Support Bra (8030)
Summary
The 34JJ's band is a lot longer than the 75K bra. The cups are quite similar in both bras.
Sizing
Bands are equivalent.
The 75K is 1 cup bigger than the 34JJ.
75K 34:15 Ewa Michalak Pl Black (64) |
34JJ 34:14 Elomi Caitlyn Underwire Side Support Bra (8030) |
|
Fits ribcage | ||
---|---|---|
85.8 | 86.4 (+0.6cm) | |
Breast perimeter | ||
0.0 | 0.0 | |
Band length | ||
65.8 | 73.6 (+7.8cm) | |
Stretched band | ||
87.8 | 90.9 (+3.1cm) | |
Cup width | ||
17.9 | 18.4 (+0.5cm) | |
Cup depth | ||
37.4 (+0.3cm) | 37.1 | |
Wire length | ||
34.3 | 40.5 (+6.3cm) | |
Cup height | ||
24.6 | 25.4 (+0.8cm) | |
Gore height | ||
10.8 | 12.0 (+1.2cm) | |
Wing height | ||
12.9 | 13.8 (+0.9cm) | |
Strap width | ||
2.2 | 2.3 (+0.1cm) | |
Cup separation | ||
1.9 | 2.2 (+0.4cm) | |
Hooks | ||
3 | 3 | |
Total bras | ||
1 | 8 |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesVERY different bras! Fullcup versus Plunge... well I'll let the pic speak for itself.
The summary seems to say the 34JJ Caitlyn has bigger cups - doesn't feel that way. The Caitlyn is quadboobing a bit on me, and the cups of the PL black are more like perfect in that respect.
The biggest difference is the width of the cups: Elomi has super wide cups, while EM has narrow ones. The plunge is just a touch too narrow on me, while there's empty fabric at the side in the fullcup.In the compare picture it's obvious to see that my boobs get MUCH more lift in the plunge, while they're angled down in the fullcup.
Updated on Dec 29, 2012
-
Exactly!!
I agree that Ewa Michalak has smaller cups. It just doesn't feel that way to you, bc that extra space in the Elomi just ends up under your arms where you cannot use it.