Comparing a 90B Ewa Michalak Ch Onyks (141) with a 65G Ewa Michalak Ch Toffik (138)
Summary
The 90B's band is a lot longer than the 65G bra. The 90B bra has wider cups but they are both about the same depth.
Sizing
The 90B is 5 bands bigger than the 65G.
The 90B is 7 cups smaller than the 65G.
|
|
|
|
90B 40:2 Ewa Michalak Ch Onyks (141) |
65G 30:9 Ewa Michalak Ch Toffik (138) |
|
| Fits ribcage | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 67.5 (+67.5cm) | |
| Breast perimeter | ||
| 0.0 | 27.6 (+27.6cm) | |
| Band length | ||
| 71.1 (+13.5cm) | 57.6 | |
| Stretched band | ||
| 0.0 | 75.2 (+75.2cm) | |
| Cup width | ||
| 14.2 (+0.9cm) | 13.4 | |
| Cup depth | ||
| 25.4 | 25.6 (+0.2cm) | |
| Wire length | ||
| 23.5 | 24.7 (+1.2cm) | |
| Cup height | ||
| 14.5 | 14.6 (+0.1cm) | |
| Gore height | ||
| 6.4 | 7.6 (+1.3cm) | |
| Wing height | ||
| 9.5 | 10.7 (+1.2cm) | |
| Strap width | ||
| 3.8 (+2.2cm) | 1.6 | |
| Cup separation | ||
| 1.5 (+0.2cm) | 1.3 | |
| Hooks | ||
| 2 | 3 | |
| Total bras | ||
| 1 | 4 | |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesI prefer the straps on CH onyx as they are wider and more padded, it's band is more stable, and even though they are almost the same cup size onyx is a hard one to squish into! Toffik has taken a LOT of hard wear between both, but has very soft unstable band mesh and skinny straps which are iritating. I do like that Toffik has fuller higher sides which helps. I have another CH cielus which is the right shape and a closer size but runs tall one me so I'll only wear in cold weather under many layers. I do tend to wear my Cielus much more even though I prefer the lower sized CH fit and shape. CH are very hard to come by so I'm admitting to consistently wearing much too small in the right shape for some comfort which is a sad tradeoff. I doubt there will be any extra short 60HH/J's in my future anytime soon but hey if someone is looking to sell here I am.
Updated on Mar 24, 2023
Link to this