Comparing a Ewa Michalak Bm Antonina (1314) with Ewa Michalak Bm Chichic in 65FF
Summary
The Bm Antonina bra has a bigger band than the Bm Chichic bra. The Bm Antonina bra has deeper cups than the Bm Chichic bra, but they are about the same width.
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak Bm Antonina (1314) |
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak Bm Chichic |
|
Fits ribcage | ||
---|---|---|
73.8 (+73.8cm) | 0.0 | |
Breast perimeter | ||
26.7 (+26.7cm) | 0.0 | |
Band length | ||
57.3 (+2.2cm) | 55.1 | |
Stretched band | ||
73.2 (+4.0cm) | 69.2 | |
Cup width | ||
13.4 (+0.7cm) | 12.7 | |
Cup depth | ||
24.7 (+1.1cm) | 23.6 | |
Wire length | ||
24.2 | 24.3 (+0.0cm) | |
Cup height | ||
17.5 | 17.5 (+0.0cm) | |
Gore height | ||
6.0 (+0.1cm) | 5.8 | |
Wing height | ||
10.0 | 10.2 (+0.2cm) | |
Strap width | ||
1.6 (+0.1cm) | 1.5 | |
Cup separation | ||
1.5 | 1.9 (+0.4cm) | |
Hooks | ||
2 | 2 | |
Total bras | ||
8 | 1 |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesThe Antonina is a bit more shallow at the wire and runs looser in the band compared to the Chichic.
Updated on May 09, 2024