Comparing a 65FF Ewa Michalak S Porcelanka (369) with a 65F Ewa Michalak Ch Biszkopty (259)
Summary
The band is pretty much the same in both bras. The 65FF bra has deeper cups than the 65F bra, but they are about the same width.
Sizing
The 65FF is 1 cup bigger than the 65F.
|
|
|
|
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak S Porcelanka (369) |
65F 30:7 Ewa Michalak Ch Biszkopty (259) |
|
| Fits ribcage | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.6 (+1.0cm) | 72.6 | |
| Breast perimeter | ||
| 26.1 (+0.4cm) | 25.7 | |
| Band length | ||
| 57.8 | 58.2 (+0.5cm) | |
| Stretched band | ||
| 75.4 (+1.8cm) | 73.6 | |
| Cup width | ||
| 13.4 (+0.5cm) | 13.0 | |
| Cup depth | ||
| 23.1 (+1.1cm) | 22.0 | |
| Wire length | ||
| 23.5 (+1.0cm) | 22.5 | |
| Cup height | ||
| 16.0 (+0.9cm) | 15.0 | |
| Gore height | ||
| 5.5 | 6.3 (+0.8cm) | |
| Wing height | ||
| 9.5 (+0.7cm) | 8.8 | |
| Strap width | ||
| 1.6 (+0.3cm) | 1.4 | |
| Cup separation | ||
| 1.8 (+0.1cm) | 1.6 | |
| Hooks | ||
| 2 | 2 | |
| Total bras | ||
| 12 | 8 | |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesThe Porcelanka seems to fit maybe a half cup larger than the Biszkopty. It has slightly narrower wires. Bands were about the same. Is slightly less open on top due to construction (Biszkopty can also cut in though).
Updated on Feb 03, 2016
-
Hasn't written a review yet
Link to this