Comparing a 65FF with 60G in Ewa Michalak S Syrena (790)
Summary
The 65FF bra has a bigger band than the 60G bra. The cups are quite similar in both bras.
Sizing
The 65FF is 1 band bigger than the 60G.
The 65FF is 1 cup smaller than the 60G.
|
|
|
|
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak S Syrena (790) |
60G 28:9 Ewa Michalak S Syrena (790) |
|
| Fits ribcage | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.8 (+5.8cm) | 66.0 | |
| Breast perimeter | ||
| 25.9 | 27.9 (+2.0cm) | |
| Band length | ||
| 58.0 (+3.0cm) | 55.0 | |
| Stretched band | ||
| 74.6 (+1.5cm) | 73.1 | |
| Cup width | ||
| 13.5 | 13.9 (+0.4cm) | |
| Cup depth | ||
| 23.6 | 23.7 (+0.2cm) | |
| Wire length | ||
| 24.0 | 24.1 (+0.1cm) | |
| Cup height | ||
| 16.3 (+0.5cm) | 15.9 | |
| Gore height | ||
| 6.0 | 6.3 (+0.3cm) | |
| Wing height | ||
| 9.8 | 10.2 (+0.4cm) | |
| Strap width | ||
| 1.7 | 1.8 (+0.1cm) | |
| Cup separation | ||
| 1.6 | 1.8 (+0.2cm) | |
| Hooks | ||
| 2 | 2 | |
| Total bras | ||
| 11 | 4 | |
People who have both bras say:
-
0
likesThese bras fit very similarly on me. Upon remeasuring, the 65 is about an inch larger in the band (22.5" vs. 21.5"), but is less stretchy, so that they both stretch to about 29.5-30" before distorting. They look very similar on and both are a smidge small on my larger side. The cups are very TTS. The 65 cups are a couple of mm smaller in depth than the 60 and the same height and width. Wearing them both all day, I felt slightly more comfortable in the 60G, for some reason.
Updated on Feb 06, 2019
Link to this