Comparing a Ewa Michalak S Syrena (790) with Ewa Michalak M Perłowy (847) in 65FF
Summary
The S Syrena bra has a bigger band than the M Perłowy bra. The cups are quite similar in both bras.
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak S Syrena (790) |
65FF 30:8 Ewa Michalak M Perłowy (847) |
|
Fits ribcage | ||
---|---|---|
71.8 (+4.7cm) | 67.1 | |
Breast perimeter | ||
25.9 (+1.2cm) | 24.7 | |
Band length | ||
58.0 (+3.7cm) | 54.3 | |
Stretched band | ||
74.6 (+5.1cm) | 69.5 | |
Cup width | ||
13.5 | 13.7 (+0.2cm) | |
Cup depth | ||
23.6 | 23.8 (+0.2cm) | |
Wire length | ||
24.0 (+3.2cm) | 20.8 | |
Cup height | ||
16.3 (+2.1cm) | 14.3 | |
Gore height | ||
6.0 (+1.4cm) | 4.6 | |
Wing height | ||
9.8 (+0.6cm) | 9.2 | |
Strap width | ||
1.7 (+0.2cm) | 1.5 | |
Cup separation | ||
1.6 | 1.9 (+0.3cm) | |
Hooks | ||
2 | 2 | |
Total bras | ||
11 | 8 |
People who have both bras say:
-
1
likeI'd say these fit approximately the same size in the cups overall, with the M bra cups being slightly narrower and more projected. The M Perlowy fits a band size smaller. The S Syrena is higher coverage. M is very plungy with a very low gore and leaves a lot of the breast bare so you'll get a bit more jiggle. The straps are a bit more closely placed on the M, so it's slightly better for narrow frames. I'd say M has a bit more immediate projection as well. I so wish M came in 65G and 65GG and didn't stop at 65FF.
Updated on Jun 19, 2019
-
Hasn't written a review yet